Is Wenger's Youth Policy a Mirage?


Help ma Bob
By Merlion
September 17 2011

Alan Hansen, “You don’t win anything with kids”This was the famous remark in 1995 when Alan Hansen assessed Manchester United. He was wrong because Man Utd went on to win the League by four points from Kelvin Keegan’s Newcastle United, which famously succumbed to Ferguson’s mind game.But he wasn’t wrong because Man Utd XI won the 1995/96 title with an average age of 25.46 years. A sample of Man Utd’s players in 1995/96: 

31 year old Schmeichel

31 year old Parker

31 year old McClair

30 year old Pallister

29 year old Irwin

24 year old Lee Sharpe

24 year old Roy Keane

21 year old Ryan Giggs

20 year old David Beckham

20 year old Nicky Butt

20 year old Paul Scholes

20 year old Gary Nelville

18 year old Phil Nelville

That is, it is all smoke and mirrors with everyone fooled by journalists and pundits who focused only on 3 or 4 young players in the team and forgot all about those experienced players who are the backbone of any title-winning team.

Below are extracts (minor revision by me) from the very informative 2010 book by Paul Tomkins “Pay as you Play” – The True Price of Success in the Premier League Era.

In terms of the Premier League as a whole, the average age of a premiership team has been 26.83 years. The youngest club – based on the average age of all XIs they have fielded in the Premier League – is Crystal Palace, at 25.48.

The youngest team ever to play a Premier League season is O’Leary Leeds United in 1999/00 season with an average age of just 23.97 years. As well as O’Leary, plenty of managers have lowered average ages than Wenger’s (and most of them get little or no praise for playing ‘the kids’).

Benitez’s Liverpool averaged an age of 26.22;

Ferguson’s United have an average playing age of 26.59;

Martin O’Neill in his time at Leicester and Aston Villa fielded teams with an average of 26.74.

Gerrard Houllier’s Liverpool average age was well below Wenger’s, with the average age of his Liverpool teams standing at 25.21 years – a good year and a half younger than the average Arsenal side under Wenger.

Based on a span of 18 years (or seasons), those “evergreen” in Premier League had an average age as follows:

 

25.73 years – Liverpool

26.13 years – Spurs

26.34 years – Aston Villa

26.59 years – Manchester United

26.90 years – Chelsea

27.02 years – Arsenal

27.16 years – Everton

Chelsea won the title in 2004/05 with the youngest squad an average age of 25.21 years. And Chelsea also won the title in 2009/10 with the oldest squad with an average of 28.73 years.

Teams do not win the Premier League with kids. And the average of Premier League champions is 26.69 years from 1992/93 to 2009/10. This proved Arsene Wenger’s assertion that a player reaches his peak between 24 to 27 years old.

Arsene Wenger’s Arsenal won the Premier League title with an average age of over 27 years:

1997/98 – 28.09 years

2001/02 – 27.09 years

2003/04 – 27.28 years

The sad truth is that Arsene Wenger’s Premiership League team has an average playing age of 26.84 years, almost exactly the Premier League average.

Young blood: Who gives youngsters their Premier League break?

So which clubs like to develop home-grown talent and which managers give their youngsters a chance?

The club that has given Premier League debuts to the most youth team players is Manchester United with an impressive 40 since 1992.

Next is Middlesboro with a very healthy 32 debuts for youngsters – even better when consider they have been out of the top flight for four of the 18 seasons. Of course, Steve Gibson famously wanted to create a team of locals. And indeed, Steve McLaren handed debuts to an impressive 18 youngsters during his reign – including a team made up almost entirely of local academy players for his final game against Fulham (albeit a meaningless game) in the 2005/06 season. The average age of the starting XI at Fulham that day was just 20 years, making it the youngest ever Premier League side.

Arsenal ranked 3rd, with a total of 28 youth team players coming through the ranks. Arsene Wenger has been responsible for 18 of those debuts – again perhaps not as many as you might think; after all, it’s the same number as Steve McLaren, who was in the Middlesboro job for just five seasons compared with Wenger’s 14 so far.

Next are Manchester City with 26 youth team debuts, and a host of other clubs fairly well renowned for their academies: Spurs (25), Aston Villa (22), West Ham (22), Newcastle (22), Leeds United (21), Everton (21), Liverpool (15) and Chelsea (15).

When it comes to managers, no one can live with Ferguson, who can lay claim to giving all 40 of Manchester United’s youths their Premier League debuts.

Wenger and McLaren are next with their 18 apiece – over 14 seasons in Wenger’s case and just 5 seasons in McLaren’s.

Next are Peter Reid and George Graham with a laudable 17 youth player debuts each in respective spells at Manchester City and Sunderland, and Arsenal, Leeds and Spurs.

Bryan Robson is next alongside Kevin Keegan. They both gave debuts to 14 youngsters.

Alan Curbishley has 13 at Charlton and West Ham, along wth Graham taylor who gave 13 trainee debuts at Watford and Aston Villa.

Gerry Francis, Howard Wilkinson and Graeme Souness have 12 each. Trevor Francis handed out 11 youth debuts, while Harry Redknapp, Joe Royle and Brian Little each gave 10.

At the low end, Jose Mourinho gave debuts to just 2 trainees in his 3 seasons at Chelsea. Kenny Dalglish gave debut to Jason Wilcox at Blackburn, but no other trainees either in his 3 seasons at Blackburn or in his 6-month spell with Newcastle.

Extracts from Paul Tomkins “Pay as you Play”

_____________________________________________________________________________________

Therefore, Arsene Wenger is a superb spin doctor building up a reputation of fielding and depending on kids to win trophies, with all the tabloids and pundits lapping it all up.  Simply Arsene Wenger fielded 3 or 4 youngsters in League matches. However, Arsene Wenger cleverly used the Carling Cup matches to build up his reputation of “ implicit faith in youth” with some great performances by his teenagers. And many of his “talented youths” proved to be flops at Arsenal like Jeffers, Richard Wright, Pennant, David Bentley, Muamba, Justin Hoyte, Jay Simpson, Larsson, Parisio, Barazite, Aliadiere, Merida, Senderos, Armand Traore, Bendtner, the list is endless, but to be fair it’s the same at most other clubs with academies. The great Herbert Chapman noted that it is only a small percentage that ever make it.

Only a rare few made the break-through as regulars in the first team, namely, Anelka, Fabregas, Clichy, Djourou, Gibbs, Walcott, Wilshere, Ramsey, Frimpong and Szczesny. And this is over a span of 15 years from 1996/97 to 2010/11 season.

Let’s look at the age profile of the 2010/11 squad, which regrettably includes duds like Almunia and Squillaci. First eleven marked as starters:

First Team Players                       Birth Year   Joined on

1) 34 year-old Almunia                     1977         2004 Jul

2) 25 year-old Abou Diaby                1986         2006 Jan

3) 28 year-old Bacary Sagna             1983         2007 Jul     Starter (1)

4) 27 year-old Per Mertesacker         1984         2011 Aug   Starter (2)

5) 26 year-old Thomas Vermaelen     1985         2009 Jun    Starter (3)

6) 26 year-old Lauren Koscielny         1985         2010 Jul

7) 31 year-old Tomas Rosicky           1980         2006 May

8) 29 year-old Mikel Arteta               1982         2011 Aug   Starter (4)

9) 26 year-old Ju Young Park            1985         2011 Aug

10) 28 year-old Robin van Persie       1983         2004 May   Starter (5)

11) 21 year-old Carlos Vela               1989         2008 Jan    on-loan

12) 28 year-old Andre Santos            1983         2011 Aug

13) 21 year-old Wojciech Szczesny    1990         2007 Aug   Starter (6)

14) 22 year-old Theo Walcott            1989         2006 Jan    Starter (7)

15) 18 year-old Oxlade-Chamberlain  1993         2011 Aug

16) 21 year-old Aaron Ramsey          1990         2008 Jun

17) 24 year-old Alex Song                 1987         2005 Aug   Starter (8) 

18) 31 year-old Sebastian Squillaci     1980         2010 Aug

19) 19 year-old Jack Wilshere           1992         2001 Oct    Starter (9)

20) 24 year-old Johan Djourou          1987         2003 Aug

21) 26 year-old Lukasz Fabianski       1985         2007 May

22) 30 year-old Andrev Asrhavin       1981         2009 Feb

23) 23 year-old Vito Mannone           1988         2004 Jul

24) 19 year-old Carl Jenkinson          1992         2011 Jun

25) 19 year-old Emmanuel Frimpong  1992         2008 Jul

26) 24 year-old Gervinho                  1987         2011 Jul     Starter (10)

27) 22 year-old Keiran Gibbs             1989         2007 Sep   Starter (11)

28) 27 year-old Marouane Chamakh   1984         2010 May

29) 31 year-old Yossi Benyaoun         1980         2011 Aug

30) 19 year-old Ryo Miyaichi             1992         2011 Jan

31) 23 year-old Nicklas Bendtner       1988         2004 Aug   away on-loan

32) 23 year-old Denilson                   1988         2006 Aug   away on-loan

33) 21 year-old Henri Lansbury         1990         2007 Jul     away on-loan

34) 19 year-old Joel Campbell           1992         2011 Aug   away on-loan

 

The average age of this 29-man squad (excluding players loaned out) is 25.10 years.

The average age of First XIs (marked as starter) is 24.54 years; which is well below the average of Premier League champions of 26.69 years from 1992/93 to 2009/10.

Therefore, the squad average age of 25.10 years reflects clearly on our lack of a core of experienced 24 to 27 year old quality players; and Arsene Wenger is still too dependent on a largish group of 18 to 22 year old "inexperienced" youngsters to win honour(s) this season. Since the emergence of 17 year old Fabregas in 2004/05 season, this over “dependence of youngsters" has been repeated every season for the past 7 seasons.

Unless Arsenal’s core group of youngsters are of exceptional quality like Ferguson 1995/96 squad (average age of 25.46 years) or Mourinho 2004/05 squad (average age of 25.21 years), Arsenal’s 2011/12 squad is simply too young, too inexperienced, and devoid of marquee players to even mount a serious title challenge, let alone winning any trophy this season.

Fergie’s 18 to 21 year old Fledgings (Giggs, Beckham, Butt, Scholes, Nelville Sisters) had the likes of senior players like Eric Cantona, Schmeichel, McClair,  Parker, Pallister, Irwin, Lee Sharpe, Roy Keane, et al.

Mourinho’s 2004/05 squad has the likes of Terry, Gallas, Bridges, Makelele, Drogba, Cech, Lampard, Duff, Carvalho, Ferreira, Thiago, Robben, Crespo, Mutu, Scott Parker, et al.

Arsenal’s average age of 25.10 years is damning as at one extreme, we have duds like 34 year old Almunia, 31 year old Squillaci and “Sick-Note” Rosicky, 30 year-old Arshavin; and new buys like 29 year old Arteta, 28 year old Santos, 26 year old Ju Young Park and loaned 31 year old Benayoun, boosting our "average age" higher to project that "it is an experienced squad". But the squad is really full of raw and talented youngsters, unproven in Premier League, in Ryo, AOC, Jenkinson, Szczesny, Ramsey and Gibbs.

Wilshere, Szczesny, Ramsey and Gibbs are still developing and like Fabregas, will need at least 2 more years of development before they are fully developed and matured into the first team as senior players.

A more damning statement on the failure of Wenger’s Youth Policy would be a comparison of honours won by Ferguson and Mourinho. Wenger Wunderkind have now flopped with 6 trophyless seasons and disintegrated on August 31, 2011 with the major rebuilding of Wenger Wunderkind Mark 2. It may take the 2 to 5 years before we dare to dream of a title-winning team. That is, like the rebuilding from 1997/98 to 2001/02 – a span of 4 years – it will take the same period of 4 years to gel the existing players with new buys and 18 to 20 years old breaking into the first team.

I envisage that Wenger’s 4th Arsenal team can only be title-contenders in 2013/14 if all those youngsters fulfil their potential and develop as an “Ajax Model of team-Building”.

Alternatively, if  Arsene Wenger adopted the “2004/05 Mourinho’s Model” by spending £50million to £70million to buy world-class and marquee 24 to 27 year-old players during January 2012 and August 2012 to strengthen the squad it could ensure a Top-4 finish; as well as being good preparation for 2012/13 season.

In summary, this Arsene Wenger’s 4th Arsenal team will not be a title-contender for the next 3 years as it is short of quality and experienced players and quality youngsters, such as Mourinho’s Chelsea which won the 1995/96 title with an average age of 25.21 years.  Man Utd won the 1995/96 title with an average age of 25.46 years. The best we can look forward to is to retain Top-4 status for this season.

2011/12 Arsenal Team Key Performance Index (KPI):

 

Is Wenger's Youth Policy a Mirage?
Posted by: Arsenal Times (IP Logged)
Date: 17/09/2011 11:15

What do you think? You can have your say by posting below.
If you do not already have an account Click here to Register.



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 2011:09:23:19:02:40 by Padre Pio.

Re: Is Wenger's Youth Policy a Mirage?
Posted by: eduardo (IP Logged)
Date: 17/09/2011 12:24

just one question merl what is considered a youth team player in regards to "giving youth team players their FAPL debut"

*Signing Ozil is a signing Bergkamp type moment for Arsenal. It changes things utterly.*

Re: Is Wenger's Youth Policy a Mirage?
Posted by: AJ The Gunner (IP Logged)
Date: 17/09/2011 12:57

i got defeated by the length of the article.. i need time to read through but from the last paragraph summary,that timeline of 3 years will never work cos players want more money & to win trophies unless of cause he adopts the mourinho ala chelski style like you mentioned..we will groom them & all the hawks circulating will snap them up like cesc & nasri.. only winning something can keep the likes of cesc but not a nasri kiind of player who wants big wages.

Can We Now Trust The Process 🤔🤷🏿‍♀️ or Should We Still Remain Cautious 🙇🏿‍♀️

Re: Is Wenger's Youth Policy a Mirage?
Posted by: mapleleafgooner (IP Logged)
Date: 17/09/2011 14:51

I think it is an excellent project for Arsenal to undertake given that we are not able to compete in the big money game like Citeh & Chel$ki. But it needs to be complemented with good solid experienced players. And Wenger needs to stop treating his youngsters like they are his children. If they can't perform, they are gone. Good example is Traore. It took an 8-2 mauling by ManUre to show Wenger that Traore is not cut out for the first team when many fans don't saw he wasn't good enough and his on-field attitude is poor.

Re: Is Wenger's Youth Policy a Mirage?
Posted by: eduardo (IP Logged)
Date: 17/09/2011 14:57

maple the sale of traore was agreed the week before the utd game, that raises another question as to why in hell he was picked to play,

*Signing Ozil is a signing Bergkamp type moment for Arsenal. It changes things utterly.*

Re: Is Wenger's Youth Policy a Mirage?
Posted by: mapleleafgooner (IP Logged)
Date: 17/09/2011 14:59

Quote:
eduardo
maple the sale of traore was agreed the week before the utd game, that raises another question as to why in hell he was picked to play,

Fair enough but like u say, he should not have been selected in the first place.

Re: Is Wenger's Youth Policy a Mirage?
Posted by: RadioFreeArsenal (IP Logged)
Date: 17/09/2011 15:01

Not a mirage but a public relations exercise.There never was a youth policy , but a money-saving policy in place. Ironically enough just as the claim that it was youth policy covered that it was a money saving policy for several years and even to now, the notion that it was necessitated by the the cost of building the new stadium did and has continued to cover the reality of what actually force3d the money saving policy whihc in fact was not the cost of the new stadium. But more on that on another day.

But there was no youth poilcy but a cheaper youth poliocy in place at Arsenal. Look at the number of young talents making their way into European football since our youth poloicy was christened at other top clubs. From Cristiano(or if you oprefer Crisatain) Ronaldo through Pato, Aguero,Nani and Benzema right up to Romelu Laukaku and Phil Jones this summer - we have seen tons of gifted young players simply too expensive for Arsenal at any age apparently.

There is proof of what our youth policy was at most and at best. As I say though it makes sense that the youth policy wasn;'t all that it seemed as the reasons the policy were neccesitated weren't as they have benn said either. They are in fact the modern version of The Arsenal Stadium Mystery.

Re: Is Wenger's Youth Policy a Mirage?
Posted by: Merlion96 (IP Logged)
Date: 17/09/2011 15:07

Quote:
eduardo
just one question merl what is considered a youth team player in regards to "giving youth team players their FAPL debut"

SOrry Ed, I can't answer your quesiton as it is an extract from Paul Tomkins "Pay as you Play", a helluva "thick" book that I am stil digesting...

I recommend you all rewad this book. Very informative.

ANd my thnaks to Reds for recommending this book to moi to read...(Sm128)

Re: Is Wenger's Youth Policy a Mirage?
Posted by: eduardo (IP Logged)
Date: 17/09/2011 15:11

well merl I only asked as by my recokening we have debuted far more youth players in the FAPL than the 14 quoted in the article, so was wondering what criteria was used

*Signing Ozil is a signing Bergkamp type moment for Arsenal. It changes things utterly.*

Re: Is Wenger's Youth Policy a Mirage?
Posted by: Merlion96 (IP Logged)
Date: 17/09/2011 17:36

Arsenal ranked 3rd, with a total of 28 youth team players coming through the ranks. Arsene Wenger has been responsible for 18 of those debuts – again perhaps not as many as you might think; after all, it’s the same number as Steve McLaren, who was in the Middlesboro job for just five seasons compared with Wenger’s 14 so far.

_______________________________________________________

Ed, the "14" you referred to is the "14 seasons" from 1996 to 2010 as compared to McClaren's 5 seasons with Boro.

Re: Is Wenger's Youth Policy a Mirage?
Posted by: jkanzy (IP Logged)
Date: 19/09/2011 19:25

if God truely stands 4 wat is right den arsene's policy will nt fail. Dnt 4get, der is nothing like being self sufficient wen u cant compete financially. Dis team is similar to d team dat arsene inherited 4rm graham n he ll achieve so much dis season. Evrybody criticizes arsene wiv out takin into consideration d basics which is, arsene is a great coach n der is only one arsene. Mou, SAF, guardiola r all great bt can dey achieve wat arsene has wiv our squad. Arsenal normaly fumble wen d season is abt wrapping up, bt i ll tel u it ll nt happen dis season bcos ov d experience he acquired on d last 3days ov d transfer window. Those 5players ll change it 4 us dis season. In God i trust n arsene is a great coach. Arsenal 4 eternity.

Re: Is Wenger's Youth Policy a Mirage?
Posted by: Merlion96 (IP Logged)
Date: 22/09/2011 05:29

Although Miquel and Lansbury had already made their debut for Arsenal, I will include them as debutante from our youth rank for 2011/12 season:

1 - 19 year old Jenkinson
2 - 19 year old Frimpong
3 - 20 year old COquelin
4 - 18 year old Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain
5 - 19 year old Ryo Miyaichi
6 - 18 year old Chuks Aneke
7 - 19 year old Ozyakup
8 - 19 year old Miquel
9 - 21 year old Henri Lansbury

If we include all those Carling Cup debutantes into our senior squad, then the average age of 2011/12 squad is 24.00 years.

We define average of our First XIV - (First Eleven + SUbstitutes) for those players that played in those 9 no. games so far:

Then, Average age for First XIV:
1 - 24.00 years = average of 2011/12 squad
2 - 24.20 years = average age for 9 games.
3 - 24.47 years = average age for 5 League games.
4 - 24.50 years = average age for 3 CL Cup games.
5 - 21.93 years = average age for 1 CC games.

Average age for First XIV:
1 - 24.71 years - Newcastle
2 - 23.86 years - Udinese 1L
3 - 23.36 years - Liverpool
4 - 24.21 years - Udinese 2L
5 - 23.57 years - ManLeeds
6 - 25.07 years - Swansea
7 - 25.43 years - Dortmund
8 - 25.64 years - Blackburn

9 - 21.93 years - Shrewsbury

We cannot blame the loss against Blackburn as "immature, inexperience and youth" as it is the oldest First XIV that was fielded.

But certainly, Arsene Wenger is still obsessed with the "Ajax Model of Team Building" wiht his overtly dependence on youths and homegrown players forming the nuclues of his 4th Team.

Let's hope that our Hale End Academy will be the equal of La maisa in producing a core group of youngsters for senior team like the present Barca's Golden Generation.

Certainly, we cna forget abut winning the title this seasona s the squad is too young and lack that core group of 24 to 27 year old matured and experienced players at thier peak.

What we can do is to fight for 3rd or 4th place with one or two cup final appearance as a bonus.

Re: Is Wenger's Youth Policy a Mirage?
Posted by: Padre Pio (IP Logged)
Date: 22/09/2011 23:55

The chances of producing a complete first 11 from home grown talent is just as likely as the stadium being hit by a meteorite. Getting five great players from academy at same time is probably just as unlikely.

"When we had to suffer the team is a lion because they suffer together." 4 July 2020 at Wolverhampton Wanderers
Arteta on his team's first away victory at a club above them in the Premiership since September 2015 at Leicester.

Re: Is Wenger's Youth Policy a Mirage?
Posted by: Merlion96 (IP Logged)
Date: 23/09/2011 02:23

Although Miquel and Lansbury had already made their debut for Arsenal, I will include them as debutante from our youth rank for 2011/12 season. Let's compare the mirage of Arsene Wenger's famed youth policy in contrast to Top-6 teams.

BOLD - those youths that are key players and regular starter.
RED - those that made their debut in CC or Euro Cup (S*CUMS)

"Youth players" are defined as 23 year old and below:

Arsenal
1 - 21 year old Szezesny
2 - 19 year old Wilshere
3 - 22 year old Walcott
4 - 22 year old Ramsey
5 - 22 year old Gibbs
6 - 19 year old Jenkinson
7 - 19 year old Frimpong
8 - 20 year old Coquelin
9 - 18 year old Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain
10- 19 year old Miquel
11- 19 year old Ryo Miyaichi
12- 18 year old Chuks Aneke
13- 19 year old Ozyakup

14- 21 year old Henri Lansbury - on-loan to WHU
15- 22 year old Traore - sold

ManLeeds
1 - 21 year old De Gea
2 - 23 year old Jonny Evans
3 - 23 year old Hernandez
4 - 23 year old Anderson
5 - 22 year old Smalling
6 - 19 year old Phil Jones
7 - 22 year old Cleverley
8 - 21 year old Welbeck
9 - 21 year old Fabio de Silva
10- 21 year old Rafael de Silva
11- 21 year old Amos
12- 20 year old Macheda
13- 18 year old Progba
14- 18 year old L Cole
15- 19 year old Fryer


S*CUMS
1 - 22 year old Gareth Bale
2 - 21 year old Kyle Walker
3 - 22 year old Livermore
4 - 22 year old Giovani
5 - 20 year old Townsend
6 - 21 year old Fredericks
7 - 19 year old Carroll
8 - 19 year old Nicholson
9 - 18 year old Kane
10- 21 year old Falque
11- 20 year old Parrett
12- 22 year old Sandros
13- 18 year old Loungo


Chelski
1 - 23 year old Juan Mata
2 - 22 year old Sturridge
3 - 18 year old Lukaku
4 - 20 year old Romeu
5 - 18 year old McEachran
6 - 22 year old Bertrand


Manc City
1 - 23 year old Richards
2 - 23 year old Aguero
3 - 21 year old Balotelli
4 - 20 year old Scapuzzi
5 - 19 year old Razak
6 - 117 year old Rekik


Liverpool
1 - 21 year old Jordan Henderson
2 - 20 year old Wilson
3 - 22 year old Andy Carroll
4 - 18 year old Robinson
5 - 21 year old Kelly
6 - 19 year old Shelvey
7 - 23 year old Spearing
8 - 21 year old Coates


_____________________________________________________

You can see that ManLeeds has the best youth squad with Fergie Fledgings Mark 2 in a class of its own.

Chelski and CITEH did not invested much in youth for the present. But with their bottomless pit of petrodollars, they too are getting their acts together to invest in youths.

S*CUMS? Liverpool?
They are gettignt heir acts together with talented yougnsters breaking into senior team.

tehrefore after more than 10 years, Arsene Wenger is still way way behind ferguson in grooving in talented youngsters into senior team.

Re: Is Wenger's Youth Policy a Mirage?
Posted by: Merlion96 (IP Logged)
Date: 28/09/2011 05:31

For Carling Cup match last week, the average age of First XVI fielded are:

1 - 21.93 years - Arsenal
2 - 24.43 years - S*CUMS
3 - 24.64 years - Manc City
4 - 24.86 years - ManLeeds
5 - 25.77 years - Liverpool
6 - 25.79 years - Chelski

Both Chelski and Liverpool are serious on winning CC and fielded their senior team.

Arsenal, S*CUMS, both Manchester teams gave youths a chance and field 'em.

Arsenal, of course, fielded the youngest team with average age of 21.93 years.

Re: Is Wenger's Youth Policy a Mirage?
Posted by: Merlion96 (IP Logged)
Date: 28/09/2011 06:04

A comparison of the average age of the squad that played in the first 6 league games are as follows:

First XVI is defined as the 11 players plus substitutes up to 14 players fielded. Average squad age in years are as follows:

....Arsenal..... ManU...Liverpool.....Man C......Chelski.... S*CUMS
1 - 24.71 ..... 24.43 ..... 25.31 ..... 25.57 ..... 29.29 ..... postpone
2 - 23.36 ..... 24.93 ..... 25.54 ..... 25.71 ..... 29.50 ..... 27.00
3 - 23.57 ..... 24.93 ..... 26.21 ..... 25.58 ..... 28.50 ..... 27.00
4 - 25.07 ..... 25.79 ..... 26.79 ..... 24.50 ..... 27.64 ..... 26.92
5 - 25.64 ..... 25.07 ..... 25.79 ..... 25.64 ..... 27.00 ..... 27.21
6 - 25.71 ..... 26.71 ..... 26.23 ..... 25.14 ..... 27.64 ..... 26.64


You can see the disastrous transfer policy of Arsene Wenger when against Liverpool and ManLeeds, he fielded a squad of yougnsters lacking expereince and maturity with an average age of 23.36 years and 23.57 years respectively.

That is, Arsenal simply lacks that core group of 24 to 27 year old expereinced players to be a title contender.

And ManLeeds and CITEH have a relative young squad which can dominate the league for ages to come, leaving Arsenal well into the "2nd tier" team for years to come.

SImilarly, Chelski and S*CUMS have the oldest squad amongst Top-6 and they are definitely a match and may also surpass Arsenal squad in terms of quality and experience.

Liverpool squad is like a team at its peak. But is it of sufficient quality to challenge ManLeeds, CITEH and Chelski?
Guess not as they ahd been slaughtered 4-0 by S*CUMS and the managerial expertise of Daglish is quesitonable to compete for Top-4 status.

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
We record all IP addresses on the Sportnetwork message boards which may be required by the authorities in case of defamatory or abusive comment. We seek to monitor the Message Boards at regular intervals. We do not associate Sportnetwork with any of the comments and do not take responsibility for any statements or opinions expressed on the Message Boards. If you have any cause for concern over any material posted here please let us know as soon as possible by e-mailing abuse@sportnetwork.net