KOP IS SCREAMING BUT NOBODY WANTS TO HEAR
By John Christie
June 15 2010
Why? Why has one of Britains most famous world renowned sporting institutions been allowed to be asset stripped in the glare of our countries 24/7 media?
In the space of three years one of the most successful and famous football clubs in the world has been plunged on a downward spiral due to its criminal ownership. Hicks and Gillett are now poised to sell off the family silver to appease the banks ever increasing loan repayments.
The removal of Benitez was their last obstacle to allow the sale of Torres, Gerrard and Mascherano. Liverpool fans are not stupid, they have been highlighting the lies, and seen through all of the smoke and mirrors of the American PR machine for the last three years, but appear to be alone in seeing the truth.
What infuriates most is the deliberate reluctance of the media to highlight the "real" story at Liverpool. Instead they take juicy tittle tattle from the American PR people at the club, which undermines the manager instead.
This is not about managers or individuals. This is about the rape of a football club. The fans are ridiculed by many as we simply do not take the rubbish spewed out by Fleet St as gospel. We know the real story, truth be known the media do to.
So why does no one hear our screams??
If you do not already have an account Click here to Register.
Then you claim that the media don't highlight what's going on at L.F.C. but only fall for "smoke and mirrors from the American PR people". Well, the impression I get when scanning through the media is that they rather try to draw a picture of the club that is even darker than the situation already is. Problem is that most fellow Reds fall for misinformation as long as it serves their agenda.
So, what exactly are you talking about?
It is so damn infuriating watching the way that the american clowns have come in and all but destroyed the heart of the mighty reds and nobody (except the fans) are willing to do anything about it! The problem is what can the fans do? We can protest and make our feelings clear (which has been done time and time again) but H & G don't give a s**t, as long as they can make money, they wouldn't care if they upset and angered the entire world! I for one will be boycotting going to any further matches or buying anymore official merchandise while those 2 t**ts are still in charge. I do not want my beloved club ruined and I do not want to see them lose more money by people making this kind of boycott as this would seem to make things worse for the club, but what else can we do....This is the only thing, hit the americans where it hurts them most.......in their wallets!!!!
1. £110,000 – That’s how much interest payments per day that Liverpool’s parent company have to meet due to the debts piled onto the club by Tom Hicks & George Gillett.
2. Accounts show that £50.3 million has been spent on ‘costs’ associated with the new stadium since Hicks & Gillett took charge. A new stadium which there has been no sign of whatsoever.
3. Liverpool’s debt just keeps on growing under Hicks & Gillett. The 2009 accounts of the club’s parent company, Kop Football Holdings, shows total debts soared by £51.5 million in the year to July 2009.
4. The latest annual company accounts for Liverpool FC’s parent company, Kop Football Holdings, revealed record losses of £54.8 million. As of July 31st 2009, the group’s total debts were £472.5 million, causing interest payments to Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) and Wachovia, their creditors, to rise to £40.1 million. Martin Broughton, the recently appointed chairman, had to appear before the Premier League to offer assurances the club will be able to fulfil their fixtures for next season.
5. Steve Morgan could have bought the club in 2004 for £85 million. Hicks and Gillett paid £220 million in 2007 and after loading the club with debt and failing to build a new stadium; they are now believed to value it at anything between £500 million and £800 million. This over-exorbitant price has all ready precluded two serious investors from buying the club. Add in costs and investment of a new stadium and the owners are looking for a £1 billion investment.
6. Liverpool have now shelled out £85 million in interest payments on the debts incurred by Hicks & Gillett upon takeover in February 2007 and their plight is such that now on two occasions this year they had to extend their short-term credit facility with RBS.
7. RBS and Wachovia have been forcing Hicks & Gillett to move Liverpool’s borrowings away from them and on to LFC’s Cayman Islands-listed parent company. Last year, Liverpool reduced their bank loan from £350 million to £290 million but only because their offshore parent company increased its loan to the club by £86.2 million to £144.4 million. Liverpool pays 10 percent interest on this loan.
As you can see, the financial mis-management of the club is there for all to see. Couple this with the fact that Tom Hicks has forged his career on leveraged buy-outs of sports ‘franchises’ and systematically asset-stripping them to pay of his leveraged loans.
Get these morons out of our club before its too late.
[ezinearticles.com]
This Hicks is a complete and utter scumbag. The sooner he is forced out the better.
I think that all of the things you then list have been written in the media before, but it surely doesn't sell papers to write it time and again.
When you do some research about Corinthians you will surely find that Tom Hicks himself has had little to do with the ongoings there and you will also find out that their demise started when MSI (I think that was their name) took them over. It's the same company that held the transfer rights for Tevez and Mascherano. So, it doesn't exactly help our course to twist stories until they fit into our goal of getting fit and proper owners.
And please be assured that I realised some years ago that we were actually subject to a leverage buyout. I stopped spending my money on club merchandise immediately, but didn't go public as I thought that others may realise that (leverage buyout) themselves. Maybe I should have started something, because it probably wouldn't have been xenophobic, because that is where we are now. People burning USA flags and shouting "Yanks out". As if all those 300 and something million US Americans are all like Hicks & Gillett. We don't draw a very good image of our club and our knowledge in doing things that way. We'd rather drive potential supporters and owners away with stupid behaviour like that. Twisting things until they fit our agenda doesn't exactly help either. We rather enhance the image of the stupid, uneducated football fans, very much the way people who are not into football like to draw and see us.
In the short term the stars WILL be sold and the club may be reposessed by RBS and the most we can hope for is that the club remains a force in the PL.
In the medium term the club will have to be rebuilt from the ground up.
In the long term with good management it can be restored to its former glories.
Im not being pessimistic just realistic and it is realistic and effective for the fans to boycott the club whie H&G are owners. HIT 'EM HARD.
Admittedly I dont and many others condone the burning of the american flag. It was a minority of 3 that were involved in that. It was not meant as anti-American but anti-Gillett & Hicks. Granted it was very mis-guided and will not curry favour with our friends across the ocean but it must be taken into context.
The thing is are people willing to take the risk of leaving these pond life in charge of LFC? Can they be trusted? On evidence so far only a fool would trust them.
That said, Anteater, if you'd like to submit an article for our front page I'd publish it. We aren't opposed to opposite views to our own, it creates lively debate and it's good to see others perspectives. Just click on my user name Reds and send a PM.
---------------------------------
“Liverpool Football club exists not to make money, it exists to win trophies and be a source of pride for its supporters. It serves no other purpose.”. Bill Shankly
I personally think we're heading for Armeggedon because I agree Hicks would sell the light bulbs if he could - and probably intends to.
So my QUESTION is this: can RBS do ANYTHING to prevent Hicks selling half a dozen star players after the world cup in order to (1) pay off the debt owed to Kop Holdings (which is owned by H & G) and (2) service the RBS debt's interest payments.
Because my understanding is that as long as the RBS mouth gets fed on time, Hicks can continue to own the club for as long as he likes, and in the meantime, can sanction outrageous outgoing payments to architects in Texas and the like.
I suspect he plans to raise as much money from player sales as possible this summer and hire a yes-man-Manager who will be charged with cobbling together a team of players that no one else wants to buy and youngsters. And aim for mid-table.
Barcap, Broughton and Purslow certainly can't prevent Hicks from doing this.
So, to reiterate, can RBS do anything to prevent it?
How can RBS possibly 'put pressure' on Hicks or 'foreclose' or 'repossess' the club as some people are suggesting, if they have their interest payments paid on time?
Anyone??? Please??
Picketing branches, emailing execs, making posters, organising sit ins, closing bank accounts, cancelling credit cards, same with insurance policies, you name it.... everything legal of course....
The media should be tipped off every time and would be enormous... and RBS would consequently HAVE to force Hicks' hand to sell.
RBS Products and Properties are listed here: [encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com]
Child & Co
Drummonds Bank
National Westminster Bank
National Westminster Life Assurance
Royal Bank of Scotland
Royal Scottish Assurance
Churchill Insurance
Direct Line
Comfort Card
Style Cards
Direct Line
Lombard Direct
MINT
Tesco Personal Finance (50% joint venture with Tesco)
The One account
Streamline Merchant Services
WorldPay
Same applies too, to British Airways really! What the hell is Martin Broughton doing? A few sit ins at Terminal 5 etc would have the media in a frenzy and him running for cover.
If the fans don't do something like this kind of campaign it's my belief that there will be a star player exodus...
