Match Preview/Stats/Thread: Nottingham Forest v Newcastle
By Tyne-Talk
October 16 2009
Newcastle United travel to The City Ground this weekend for Saturday's 17.20 kick off on the back of 2 consecutive league draws; whilst Nottingham Forest host with 3 consecutive wins under their belt.
Unfortunately for Chris Hughton, injuries are causing a headache, with both Steven Taylor (hamstring) and Fabricio Coloccini (groin) struggling to shake off their problems. Both will have late fitness tests.
Marlon Harewood and Jose Enrique are both fit for the game which see's the top of the table fight for 3 points from 10th in the table Forest and Steve Harper is set to make his 100th league appearance for Newcastle.
For Nottingham Forest, Rob Earnshaw (hamstring) is absent and will remain sidelined for up to 4 weeks after sustaining an injury whilst on international duty, whilst James Perch (shin) and Julian Bennett are both out.
Fact: Forest have won just 1 game in their last 9 home league games against Newcastle.
Fact: Forest have not won or conceded a penalty in the league this season.
Fact: Newcastle have won more Championship matches (7), kept more clean sheets (7) and conceded fewer goals (5) that any other team.
Nottingham Forest |
| Newcastle United |
|
|
|
11 | Played | 11 |
16 | Points | 24 |
4 | Won | 7 |
3 | Lost | 1 |
4 | Drawn | 3 |
13 | Goals Scored | 18 |
12 | Goals Conceded | 5 |
If you do not already have an account Click here to Register.
Likely lineup:
Harper
R. Taylor Simpson Khizanshivelli Enrique
Guthrie Nolan Smith Jonas
Harewood Carroll
Prefered lineup:
Simpson Khizanshivelli S. Taylor Enrique
R. Taylor Smith Jonas
Guthrie Nolan
Harewood/Ranger
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2009:10:16:19:34:53 by waffles.
Quote:tunyc
Don't know why you'd prefer Carroll out of the lineup. Did you see the game he had for the U-21 team? We need to try to get in on some of that form...
I like Carroll in a 4-4-2, in a 4-5-1 I'd rather have Harewood or Ranger. Carroll is great at flicking a ball on to another striker but he's not as good as laying the ball off to the midfielders or getting into space or forcing his way forward. Yes, he had a great game in U-21 but he wasn't the lone striker and it was against Macedonia, who hasn't been important since 323 BC.
If we have a lone striker it needs to be someone who will run into space (the way Ameobi does), power past a defender (the way Harewood does), or lay off to Nolan/Guthrie (the way Ranger does). Carroll doesn't do any of those. Carroll flicks the ball into open space behind the defense better than any other striker, but without Ameobi or Lovenkrands, who is going to get onto that ball? He wins headers in the box, but so do Harewood and Ranger.
I would love to have Carroll in the game, but I'm also of the opinion that we should be playing a 5-man midfield when the defense is healthy, simply because our midfield talent is better than any other in the league. If that means excluding Carroll for a game, then so be it.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2009:10:16:20:23:40 by waffles.
I just like choosing my team based on form, and I have yet to be very impressed by Harewood and Ranger's form has seemed to slip with every game. When I ask myself who's most likely to take a chance, the answer is Carroll.
Quote:waffles
Macedonia, who hasn't been important since 323 BC
Nice! Not often is my study of ancient history necessary to follow comments here. I guess I didn't totally waste those years in college!
By the way, didn't Macedonia's full national team beat England in Euro qualifying last time around?
Quote:tunyc
Good points, tactically.
I just like choosing my team based on form, and I have yet to be very impressed by Harewood and Ranger's form has seemed to slip with every game. When I ask myself who's most likely to take a chance, the answer is Carroll.
Form is top priority, that's fair, but a close #2 is chemistry. The squad has gotten 15 points (5 wins, 1 loss) out of 6 games in a 4-5-1, but only 9 points (2 wins, 3 draws) in 5 games with a 4-4-2. The only reason for us to play 4-4-2 right now is the requirement of R. Taylor to play Right back (which means Simpson is hurt or is forced to play in the center [meaning 2 out of Taylor, Colo, Khizashivelli are]).
without checking (boo!), i think our poorest showings have followed extended breaks such as the one we've just had. hope we hit the ground running today


nolan 2-0 60/1
carroll anytime scorer 21/10
looks reasonable imo





Matter of time really.Lets hope we can get a 2 goal comeback 2nd half
Giving ball away too much.
Harewood looking like the 'old' Ameobi.
Where were the centerbacks for the goal?
Absolute Rubbish!

Quote:mentalman
harewood needs to come off, he's absolute gash
Yeah, it's like he's trying to prove his foot's not hurt...but he's not right out there.






Quote:TOONTILLIDIE
We got lucky with a few other results going our way. FFS lads sort this out, with the players we have we should be beating teams like Forest
I mentioned it at the top of the thread. We have 15 points in 6 matches in a 4-5-1. This gives us 9 points in 6 matches in a 4-4-2. We have yet to win since reverting to the 4-4-2 after the Petersborough match. There was no reason to do switch formations. We've lost the chemistry that was so obvious in the early part of the season.
HUGHTON, GO BACK TO THE 4-5-1. I'D RATHER WIN 1-0 WITH A GOAL FROM NOLAN, GUTHRIE, OR A SET PIECE THEN DRAW 1-1 WITH A GOAL FROM A FORWARD!
Quote:wafflesQuote:TOONTILLIDIE
We got lucky with a few other results going our way. FFS lads sort this out, with the players we have we should be beating teams like Forest
I mentioned it at the top of the thread. We have 15 points in 6 matches in a 4-5-1. This gives us 9 points in 6 matches in a 4-4-2. We have yet to win since reverting to the 4-4-2 after the Petersborough match. There was no reason to do switch formations. We've lost the chemistry that was so obvious in the early part of the season.
HUGHTON, GO BACK TO THE 4-5-1. I'D RATHER WIN 1-0 WITH A GOAL FROM NOLAN, GUTHRIE, OR A SET PIECE THEN DRAW 1-1 WITH A GOAL FROM A FORWARD!
unless you count ipswich as a win?! generally agree though, i think its the way to get most out of nolan and smith, and we are lacking the kind of penetrative player needed out wide for 4 4 2.
got to say i dont agree that we have a squad which should win games easily every week, we have players capable of out-thinking/moving your average championship opponent, but every game we play will be scrutinised by the next team we are due to face. coaching will come into it - if you were about to play newcastle, and watched us tonight, you would perhaps be tempted to screen the back four with one or even two holding midfielders, as blackpool also did, and invite us to play our way through. we struggle to do that. we need a new 'plan b', and we need it fast, before all teams set out to frustrate us this way
With the 5 mifielders we have more options and we pass the ball around and rip teams apart. Nolan hasn't got great pace so this suits him, he can have more of a free role and play unmarked. He is more likely to score than anybody else so lets get him back in the positions to do it. Guhthrie is better in the midfield than on the wing. We had injuries but could have still fielded a better team.
Harper
Geremi Simpson Khizanshivelli Enrique
R.Taylor Guthrie Nolan Smith Lovernkrands
Ranger
Then we still have Jonas to come on, ok we knew he wasn't going to start after the Argie game.
Things need to change quick otherwise if we keep dropping points, confidence will go down, we drop into the playoffs or even worse below them and then it is a battle.
We do have problems but last night was not the end of the world and i still think we should finish top 2
